top of page
  • Writer's pictureRoyzz & Co

ARTIST vs. AI

Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd. et al, Docket No. 3:23-cv-00201 (N.D. Cal. Jan 13, 2023)


FACTS

  • Class action lawsuit against ‘Stability AI Ltd.’, ‘Midjourney Inc’, ‘Deviantart Inc’ (AI Software Company) filed;

  • These software takes images and artworks and use them to train their systems to generate seemingly new images;

  • These images can then be downloaded by users.

ALLEGATIONS

  • Artworks created were used as “Training Image” without prior consent;

  • The companies alleged to be involved in direct as well as vicarious copyright infringement;

  • Companies also alleged for unfair competition by infringing copyright laws of the Plaintiff and the class.

A.I COMPANY’S STAND

  • Requested the court to reject the proposed class action lawsuit;

  • AI generated images are not comparable to artists’ creations;

  • Case lacked precise details about the photos that were allegedly misappropriated;

  • Plaintiff fails to identify a single allegedly infringing image.

IMPLICATIONS

  • • The case touches upon the issue of AI and Copyright;

  • Copyright infringing by AI software is a relevant contemporary issue and varied forums in world are soon going to face similar question of law;

  • Whether work produced by AI can be infringing of a copyright is an important question that can be answered by this case;

  • The decision in this case will set a precedent as to whether AI Software can be held liable for IP infringement.



Recent Posts

See All

Is SARFAESI applicable to MSMEs?

The Division Bench of Bombay High Court held that the Banks/NBFCs are not obliged to adopt the restructuring process on their own if there is no application to do so by the Petitioners/MSMEs. The Bomb

bottom of page